Politician - Proof Policy ? ∗
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper I discuss the nature of the political constraints that the World Bank faces in delivering basic services to the poor. The main problem arises because the Bank has to work through domestic governments which have political aims different from helping the poor. The conceptual approach attractive to economists and central to the WDR2004 is the notion of politician prooÞng. Given that political incentives derail good policies, how can those policies be politician-proofed? I argue that evidence and theory suggests that such an approach is ultimately futile, basically because we simply do not understand the relevant political incentives. I discuss alternative policy strategies and conclude that what is required is a much more fundamental assessment of what type of political equilibria deliver services to the poor. As I illustrate with the case of Botswana, once the political equilibrium is right, everything goes right and politician prooÞng is redundant. ∗Paper prepared as a background paper to the World Banks 2004 World Development Report. I am grateful to Ben Goldfrank and Joel Hellman for suggestions. Department of Political Science and Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley, 210 Barrows Hall, Berkeley, CA94720. e-mail: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
Policy Making with Reputation Concerns ∗
We study the policy choice of an office-holding politician who is concerned with the public’s perception of his capabilities. The politician decides whether to maintain the status quo or to conduct a risky reform. The success of the reform depends critically upon the abilities of the politician, which is privately known to the politician. The public observes both his policy choice and the outco...
متن کاملShould We Tax or Cap Political Contributions? A Lobbying Model With Policy Favors and Access
This paper develops a model of political contributions in which a politician can either sell policy favors, or sell access. Access allows interest groups to share hard information with the politician in support of their preferred policy. Here selling access maximizes policy utility, while selling policy favors maximizes total contributions. Imposing a binding contribution limit makes it more li...
متن کاملInformational Lobbying and Competition for Access
There is substantial evidence that political contributions buy access to politicians. This paper incorporates access into a model of informational lobbying, then uses the access framework to analyze the impact of contribution limits on policy outcomes and representative citizen welfare. In the competition for access model, interest groups provide contributions to a politician and those that pro...
متن کاملTerm limits and bounds on policy responsiveness in dynamic elections
I analyze equilibria in an infinite-horizon model of elections with a twoperiod term limit in the presence of adverse selection and moral hazard. The focus is on responsiveness of policy choices of first-term politicians. In equilibrium, office holders’ policy choices are ordered by type; politicians exert positive effort in the first term of office; and as politicians become highly office moti...
متن کاملIdeologues or Pragmatists?∗
We study a model of electoral control where the politician is a policy expert, but the voter is not. First, we focus on the case of an “ideologue,” i.e., a politician who always wants the same policy implemented regardless of the state. We show that the voter’s lack of policy expertise comes at no cost to him, but may come at an electoral cost to the politician. Next, we turn to the case of a “...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003